One dashboard for every paper, its status, and its co-authors — plus fourteen review tools you spend a token on only when they help.
Free forever for tracking · 5 tokens on signup · no subscription
| Manuscript | Venue | Status | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attention-Guided Retrieval for Scientific QA | Nature Mach. Intell. | In review | In 3 days |
| Causal Inference in Observational Health Data | Lancet Digital Health | Major revision | Tomorrow |
| Graph Neural Networks for Protein Folding | Bioinformatics | Minor revision | — |
| Federated Learning under Non-IID Constraints | ICML 2026 | Submitted | — |
| A Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation | ACM Comput. Surveys | Accepted | Jun 2026 |
| Efficient Long-Context Transformers | NeurIPS 2026 | Planned | In 21 days |
A card per manuscript: title, venue, co-authors, priority, deadline, and the file itself.
Planned, in review, decided — one board, with the nearest deadline always on top.
Invite co-authors by email. Same files, same status. Edits saved back to one document.
Nothing runs without your asking. Tracking, teams, chat, grammar and Explorer never cost a token.
| Tool | What it does | Category | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| War Room | Venue targeting, reference simulation, revision plan and acceptance prediction in one session. | Orchestration | 8 tk |
| Deep Review | Thirteen role-based agents audit the manuscript and return findings with severity and fixes. | Review | 6 tk |
| Peer Review Simulator | Three independent reviewer reports with verdict, strengths, weaknesses, questions. | Review | 1 tk |
| Journal Recommender | Ranked venue matches from your title, abstract and extracted keywords. | Targeting | 1 tk |
| Reference Checker | Extracts and re-verifies citations, exports BibTeX, RIS, JSON, plain text. | Integrity | 1 tk |
| Novelty Checker | Per-paper similarity scoring against the closest related literature. | Integrity | 1 tk |
| AI Detector | Section-level AI-likelihood estimate with verdict and confidence. | Integrity | 1 tk |
| Keyword & Abstract Studio | Ten targeted keywords and three publication-ready abstract variations. | Writing | 1 tk |
| Summarizer | Structured summary of any PDF: contribution, methods, experiments, results, limits. | Reading | 1 tk |
| Academic Assistant | Natural-language questions over journals, authors, publishers, institutions. | Discovery | 1 tk |
| Submission Tracker | The dashboard: venues, deadlines, statuses, reviewer notes, attached files. | Pipeline | Free |
| Grammar Checker | Grammar, clarity and scholarly tone, with OCR for PDF workflows. | Writing | Free |
| Academic Explorer | Browse and compare journals, publishers, institutions on an OpenAlex-backed dataset. | Discovery | Free |
| Teams | Shared lab workspace, one token pool, member activity and built-in chat. | Collaboration | Free |
Supervisors, students and collaborators share a workspace — without mixing lab resources over anyone’s personal account.
Your own dashboard for every paper and deadlines — with AI review where it helps.
Start freeBring your co-authors into shared papers and one workspace, so everyone sees the same files and status.
Create a teamA managed workspace for a whole lab, with onboarding and usage controls set up around how you work.
Contact usThe War Room caught three inconsistencies my co-authors and I had missed for weeks. We submitted two days early for the first time in my career.
Finally one dashboard for the whole lab. I can see every manuscript, who owns it, and what deadline is next — at a glance.
Reference Checker alone saved me an entire weekend. It flagged four broken citations before the editor ever saw them.
Yes. Tracking your submissions on the Dashboard is free and does not use tokens. You only spend tokens when you run an AI tool such as Deep Review or War Room.
War Room is the planning workspace. It combines review results with tasks like reviewer suggestions, keywords, abstracts, and venue targeting.
Deep Review is the 13-check manuscript audit. You can run it alone or use it inside War Room.
No. The Peer Review Simulator gives you an early, independent read so you can fix problems before submission. It complements journal peer review; it does not replace it.
Yes. Manuscripts are processed for the analyses you request and are not used to train external public AI models.
ScholaRef uses tokens, not subscriptions. New accounts start with 5 free tokens; after that you buy token packs and only spend when you run a tool. Each tool shows its token cost up front.
Yes. Invite co-authors to a paper and they see the same files and status. Edits are saved back to one shared document.
Add your papers, invite your co-authors, and run a review only when it earns its token.